Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Request for Dismissal Ex-Parties Petitioner / Tenant filed a response to the eviction request and the case was adjourned and the same day the landlord requested the eviction request The filing, on which a notice was issued to determine the tenant's request for a speedy hearing, stated that although only the notice was issued to the tenant for the preliminary hearing, the main request for removal was made. I was prosecuted against the former party and the case was adjourned for prior evidence. The hearing was postponed, the previous evidence of the landlord was recorded and the case was adjourned for orders; the tenant of the hearing applied to keep the former party proceeding separate, but was rejected, The tenant had filed a constitutional application. The conclusion was not transparently made because the earlier tenant could not be prosecuted. The earlier part of the date when the notice was issued only on the request for a preliminary hearing and the correctness of the central request for removal. There were no reports. Secondly, the tenant applied for separation of the first party action nineteen days after the former parties action which should have been set aside because justice should not only be done, but it should be seen that it was an unknown order, circumstances. I find it irrational, perverse and malicious even as otherwise the law was in favor of a decision on competence rather than ability, allowing the constitutional petition, the latter order set aside.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
