Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAYYAB versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 5 and the Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, the suit was granted Rs 3000 per month for rehabilitation against the father of a minor trial court which was reduced to Rs 1500 by the first appellate court. ? In order to keep his child in law, he tried to avoid paying for the care by relying on a document relating to the custody of the child; both the courts below correctly found that such a document was not binding. That is, the appeal decision not to be sustained, the constitutional application was accepted

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Food v. MADINA JUTE MILLS LIMITED through Director 2010 CLC 812
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ v. Mst. SAADIA PARVEEN 2010 MLD 813
• BUSHRA BIBI v. SAIFULLAH 2010 CLC 815
• Hakim KHUSHI MUHAMMAD v. Mst. TALAAT RANA 2010 CLC 819
• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 822
• State v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB 2010 PLC(CS) 822
• KHURSHID ALI v. SHEHBAZ AHMAD 2010 CLC 823
• FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, FAISALABAD through Director General v. Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM 2010 CLC 825

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Arifwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes