Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL ALIAS KALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 392/411 burglary and theft of property stolen fraudulently, further investigation grant and the accused being a resident of the same area, identification was not difficult on the spot. The 38-day delay in filing the FIR and the fact that there was no direct recovery from the accused, but from his brother, made the case for the accused as the accused confessed on bail on further investigation. Had gone, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ASIF v. State 2010 PCrLJ 822
• State v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB 2010 PLC(CS) 822
• KHURSHID ALI v. SHEHBAZ AHMAD 2010 CLC 823
• FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, FAISALABAD through Director General v. Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM 2010 CLC 825
• Mst. SAMINA HUSNAIN v. MUNAWAR HUSSAIN 2010 YLR 827
• Miss SABOOR v. KASHIF SOHAIL 2010 CLC 828
• Mst. BHAGHAN BIBI v. ATTA MUHAMMAD 2010 MLD 830
• MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 2010 CLC 830

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Phagwar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes