Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) and (c) in the press news that the provincial government has been notified of the issuance of notification by the respondents posting as Capital City Police Officer respondents. One of the most serious incidents has been to blame for the commission's activities and mistakes. Territorial status as a result of a judicial inquiry when the High Court judges inquired of the provincial government's autonomous exercise of constitutional jurisdiction when dealing with such news under Article 199 (1) (c) of the Constitution. Was serving from When the police officer said the tragic incident occurred, in which several Christians lost their lives and their homes were burned, such tribunals blamed the commission's actions and mistakes, which led to the accusations. Sent their recommendations to the federal government as well. Initiation of action against the Government The government was awarded such negligence premium instead of taking any action against the respondents as a precautionary measure of the action of Capital City Police Officer Sue Moto by performing his important duties to the NT. From which the High Court may ask the holder of a public office to know which authority he / she is under the authority of (the capital city police officer) in particular. In view of the recommendations made by the tribunal against and sent to the federal government, the respondents should be treated as such. If he is found responsible for the commission and error, then how can he be allowed to work during the instagram when he is not eligible?
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
