It was the equivalent of section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/337 H (ii) / 148/149 installment AMD and the grant of three more investigative cases for injuries sustained. His three accomplices, who had already been granted bail by the High Court, would not even be able to distinguish the role of the accused from the role of the co-accused in the case, the record revealed. The accused was not named in the FIR. And they were involved in the supplementary statement. The statement made by the complainant involved in the case would be considered a false correction which stated that the accused persons have been subjected to further investigation, on bail. Were entitled to a discount. The other two suspects, though allegedly armed with firearms, were charged with joint firearm, based on the principle of consistency and their case that led to further investigation. To them, but they did not cause any harm to the defendant's injury or to the injured prosecutor's witness, all the accused, whose bail plea was not pressed and dismissed, The bail was granted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
