Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-II) BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

R 19 In order for the lumberman's son to be deposed to such position as the lumber holder. In such a position, the sitting of the lumber holder was not privately owned; all members must be open to the State and all persons should be invited to fill such office. Only one of them is a suitable person who, on the basis of his best credentials, can work as a lumberman in the village.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GUL MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 340
• Mst. ZAHIDA PARVEEN v. MUHAMMAD NAWAZ 2010 MLD 340
• Mehr MUHAMMAD NASEEM v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman 2010 YLR 340
• SAIFULLAH v. MEHR MUHAMMAD 2010 PLD 341
• TARIQ AHMAD v. RAFIA TABASSUM 2010 YLR 347
• TARIQ MEHMOOD v. Mst. FARAH SHAHEEN 2010 YLR 349
• RAHM DAD v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, FAUJI FOUNDATION, RAWALPINDI CANTT. 2010 PLD 349
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. GHULAM NABI 2010 CLC 350

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Qambar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes