KHALIL AHMAD versus JUDGE FAMILY COURT, FAISALABAD
Section, Schedule and Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition Cross-examination of witnesses recording evidence of proceedings before the Family Court, petitioner challenged the validity of the order passed by the Family Court, under which Applicant's Right to Investigate Defendant's Testimony Was Closed. The affidavit clearly showed that on two occasions, cross-examination of defendant's witnesses proceeded with caution. It was postponed that the applicant was being given the last chance to examine witnesses that the applicant was temporarily reluctant. Appeared to be the victim of In examining the testimony of the defendant presented by the defendant in order to tamper with and prolong the case, not only was the impeachment order passed by the Family Court not only with the authority, but also with the whole intent and purposes. The incomplete order was also mutually exclusive. Applicable to the Family Law Applicants will have the opportunity to challenge, if and when they appeal against, the final decision / decision under Section 14 of the Family Courts Act, 1964. The applicant will have appropriate and alternative treatment. In view of the applicant's conduct at the time of the appeal, the Family Court was compelled to pass an unconstitutional order, in the absence of any unlawful interference or irregularity in the approval of the uncontested orders. Was rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
