M.C. B BANK, LTD., THROUGH AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH GOVERNOR
Sector 41 Protection of Economic Reforms Act (XII of 1992), Section 10 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Articles 199 (1) and (5) The obligation to maintain a constitutional application The Car / Retired Employees Association complaint was that its members were entitled to some pension benefits that were being denied under the modification of the revised pay package implemented by the financial bank, section of the Economic Reform Act 1992 Under 10, there was a ban on change of contract / financial commitment / obligation. There is no prohibition in Section 10 of the Economic Reform Act, 1992; instead of the clear meaning and interpretation of Section 10 of the Economic Reform Act, 1992, employees can be amended / notified by agreement. It was open to the partners to keep the consensus and alternatives despite the agreement / agreement. The re-application was already entered into the members of the applicant association when they were employed by the bank on which it was implemented. The revised pay package was purchased and he received all the benefits due to such a package which he was not impressed with. Under the provisions of Section 23 of the Contract Act, 1872 applicants / retired employees withdrew from their own conduct to challenge the revised pay package to members of the Association. Apart from the principles of acquittal and waiver which were also attracted to the dismissal of his position, the High Court could not, in the constitutional jurisdiction, revoke the revised pay package, nor could the High Court favor the parties. May enter into an agreement under Article 41 of this Agreement
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
