Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed praised the FIR, which was recorded 1 1/2 hours after the incident, cannot be said that an eyewitness was not a resident of the incident, where the incident took place. It happened. Some of them gave reasons for their presence at the scene. And the circumstances of the case suggested that they had the presence of witnesses at the scene, supporting the medical evidence of four witnesses, both witnesses unanimously said that the accused Hostility witnesses were not suggested to be hostile at the three firearms because they were falsely filing cases against the accused, as in such cases, the replacement of the accused was a rare occurrence when prosecution witnesses testified against the prosecution. The motive was not challenged after the witness was prosecuted. The cross-examination said that the accused threw a pistol on the spot and police seized it from the spot. In such cases the recovery of the weapons of the crime was suspected and the report of the forensic science laboratory could not be relied upon, there was ample evidence on record to link the accused to the crime as both witnesses agreed. Identify that it was the accused who fired three bullets at the deceased and their testimony helped with the medical evidence available on record, the accused was convicted under Section 2302 (b), the circumstances of the prosecution were: That the accused and the accused were speedy friends and the accused had no previous rivalry with no pre-existence of the accused who committed the murder
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
