Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

Section 426 of the Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 458 and 337H (2) of the domestic offense and punishing the applicant / accused for hurting a speedy or negligent act was three years and from this The first review request was rejected. For the final hearing, it was possible that the accused could have served his entire sentence, without touching on the merits of the case, a request for a suspension was allowed and the trial court had suspended the conviction against the accused and admitted them on bail. was done. , Under the circumstances

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD JAVED IQBAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN 2010 MLD 1080
• MUHAMMAD UMAR v. State 2010 YLR 1082
• TALHA SIDDIQUE v. DIRECTOR COMSATS 2010 CLC 1084
• WASA v. ABDUR RAZZAK JILLANI 2010 YLR 1086
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1089
• DOST MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 YLR 1090
• NAWAB KHAN v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2010 YLR 1091
• Engr. GHULAM MUSTAFA QAZI v. SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2010 CLC 1091

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocate for immigration from Chak 4 b c lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes