Section 54 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1, 2 Application for a Permanent Order Removal that the Claimant Claims to Occupy a Specific Part of the Commonwealth's Land, Approves the Permanent Order Had filed for It has been ordered against the defendants to prevent the plaintiff from interfering with the plaintiff's land in the joint jurisdiction without the accused, and a case for permanent injunction was also filed for temporary injunction. This application was rejected by the courts simultaneously. The two courts below have shown that the defendants are partners, each participant in the joint case is considered to occupy every inch of land. And that the plaintiff was to file a case for division in the appropriate forum and not a permanent injunction case, the finding of coordination of the two courts below, in the rejection of the stay petitions, the best examination of the evidence. Which were not arbitrary, unrealistic, and based on good reasons that the plaintiff could not establish a case, a temporary injunction was granted by both the courts, which is quite legal and in accordance with the law. , Require no interference by the High Court in the absence of illegal jurisdiction or failure In order to exercise legal jurisdiction over addictions, the review petition against the conclusions of the two courts below was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
