Articles 2 (2 (b) and at 32 am) in the morning and the appreciation of the evidence.The benefit of the FIR of the doubt was filed after the time of the claim of the prosecution, the possibility of consideration cannot be ruled out, two separate. Incidents, the cause of the killing of one victim and the injury of another witness, were done together by the prosecution in an FIR, the injured prosecutor's witness may not necessarily be a true witness and his testimony Without investigation, it was not acceptable. He has seen in the light of the torch that his credibility is not credible, because the complainant was not carrying any torch with him and the same thing was not offered during the investigation. Acular evidence was denied, pistol. And Khanjur had no importance in recovering the accused just because the nature of the prosecution's story was neither possible nor free from suspicion, the benefit of which is not a matter of grace to the accused, but of the accused in the matter of truth. Was done.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
