WAQAS ZAFAR versus BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKRIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR
Regulation No. 11 (v) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Release of Applicant Student from the University of Constitutional Submission, who was admitted to the University, excluded from the University of SC Physics (Semester System) on the basis of finance. had gone. The GP's suggestion for the student / applicant was that he could not leave in the third semester, but he could only be detained in the third semester while other students who did not even need GP. The university was detained and the applicant was treated unfairly, which was unnecessary in the eyes of the university authorities, they were the best judges of their affairs, and the High Court generally dealt with the internal affairs of university law. I did not interfere with the way the university came into being. Empowers your authorities to regulate rules, regulations, practices, standards and exams periodically from time to time, when complying with relevant rules and regulations using their constitutional jurisdiction. And, with only compassionate consideration, could not change the opinion of those who were actively involved in formulating this policy. That other students were treated differently as there was no other student who failed to perform well and failed to obtain the required GPA and Regulation 11 (v) to the CGPA. Was removed from the role of the department under The university authorities had the authority to create their own rules to achieve the highest standards of the university, so that the applicant could be excluded from the department's role.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
