In section 302, the sentence for appreciating the evidence, the two parties were closely related to the reduction, the FIR alleged that the mother of the accused had moved out of the house about 3/2 years ago because of the accused. He left home because of a dispute with his father. ; And the suspect suspected that the victim had hid his mother in an unknown location. The complainant and the prosecution witness testified before the trial court, describing the circumstances leading to the murder of the accused. The statements of the prosecution witnesses were factual. The presence of the FIR stated that at the relevant time these witnesses appeared very natural where the incidents occurred. Both owners of the plot said that the witnesses were closely related to the accused, there is no reason why the witnesses To say that they have been wrongly dismissed. The case against the accused was to file an FIR immediately against the same accused, and in such cases when the victim's addicts and relatives were replaced by the real culprit, it was a rare occurrence. The nature of the injuries was obtained from the forensic science report in the laboratory, which revealed that it corresponded to the pistol recovered from the scene, which was recovered by the suspects during the investigation. Had, in the circumstances, proved its case against the accused in a stir, it was the only firearm. Attributed to the injury suspect, the suspect was aggravated by the complaining party's conduct that the victim had hid his mother in an unknown location for the purpose that it could easily be said that
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
