Find a Lawyer

WASEEM AHMAD ALIAS SEEMI versus MUKHTAR AHMAD

Attempts to perform a section 49 (Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324/337 F (vi) juvenile justice system ordinance (XXII of 2000), section 10 (7) (b) after murder) occurred outside the home. Not in it. As stated in the FIR record, it shows that the FIR defects have increased and that during the investigation they were found to be wrong to the extent that the accused in the present case was underage and he had committed the offense under Section 10. (7) (b) taken advantage of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the accused admitted on bail, under conditions

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GHULAM RASOOL v. MUHAMMAD DIN 2010 CLC 995
• NASEER AHMAD v. State 2010 MLD 995
• ASGHAR ALI v. PUNJAB PROVINCE through Collector District Sargodha 2010 CLC 997
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ MAAN v. DIRECTOR-GENERAL, ANTI-CORRUPTION 2010 PCrLJ 997
• YASIN alias BHUTTO v. State 2010 MLD 998
• WAQAS ZAFAR v. BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKRIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor 2010 CLC 999
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2010 YLR 999
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 YLR 1001

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes