ASGHAR ALI versus PUNJAB PROVINCE THROUGH COLLECTOR DISTRICT SARGODHA
A total of 38 dates have been set aside for proof of progress by the plaintiff, from the image date of the cases, to the failure to present evidence in Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XVII, R 3. At the request of the plaintiff, he had to postpone with the price and warning to present his evidence, but the plaintiff nevertheless failed to present his evidence, eventually the suit filed by the plaintiff Dismissed who requested that he not be present. Evidence of this when he was found to be involved in a road accident, he could not prove this claim as no accident was mentioned in the record, except that it had about three years and 38 postponements and on the request of the claimant several, And in particular the last three costs were, and the plaintiff did not care to include his evidence, the suit was rejected by both the courts below and said that the dismissal order cannot be interrupted. ?
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
