Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus KHALID AMIN

Sections 115 and O VII, R 2 Revision Scope Money Suit Plaintiff alleges that Defendant purchased the Thresher from it but refused to pay the remainder of the tie price. The defendants claimed that the case was false and that the trial court dismissed the unjustified trial. The CPC revision was dismissed by the respondent / applicant who could not identify any illegal or legal jurisdictional error in the appeals verdicts regarding factual questions.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• YASIN alias BHUTTO v. State 2010 MLD 998
• WAQAS ZAFAR v. BAHA-UD-DIN ZAKRIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN through Vice-Chancellor 2010 CLC 999
• MUHAMMAD AKHTAR v. State 2010 YLR 999
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 YLR 1001
• AHMAD BAKHSH v. MAKHAN KHAN 2010 MLD 1005
• MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE v. SHAFAIT ALI SHEIKH 2010 CLC 1006
• ZAFAR GULZAR v. S.S.P. Special Branch 2010 MLD 1012
• NASCO PACKAGING (PVT.) LTD. v. Sheikh INAM-UL-HAQ 2010 CLD 1014

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law websites from Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes