Clause 42 of the 42 Development Law (XV of 1949), Section 21 of the West Pakistan Land Reforms Regulations, 1959, Para 22 suit for the plaintiffs claiming that he was the owner of the suit land as Edna Malik in the interest of his predecessor. Claim back. In 1951, the defendants also filed a case against the plaintiffs in adjusting the land acquired by the Thala Development Authority. Both cases were consolidated. The trial court dismissed the central / original case and the appellant filed with the defendants. The Court stated that the plaintiffs / petitioners did not occupy the land as Edna Malik had at the time of acquisition but were voluntary. He claimed that he was the owner in the interests of his predecessor who was the Edna Malik of this land, or that the Adna Malik dispute was received by the Thala Development Authority or that the Ala Malik was of secondary importance as the plaintiffs had to prove it. In the first instance, in their foremost interest was the owner of the land acquired by the Thall Development Authority Revenue Record. It claimed that in the interest of the plaintiffs, Edna Malik, who had a land measuring 27 Kanal and one Marla, did not own the land measuring 330 Kanal and 6 Marla as claimed only in the documents which stated that the interest. I owned a Predo 400. The canal-based land canals were declared a document by the trial court, so the acquisition of suit land by the professionals in the interest of the proposals and its acquisition by the land development authority could not, therefore, be questioned. The issue of land re-grant arises at this time
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
