Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 395/109/412 Documents, theft and dishonestly receiving stolen property, the complainant's grant, for the first time in his supplementary statement to the accused Was involved in the case. A year after the incident, the accused was not among those who had committed illegal judicial confession during the meeting of the accused at a meeting of the Panchayat during a cash recovery meeting of Rs 15,000, and none of them. Was proof. This incident proved to be part of the existing currency notes that the complainant's supplementary statement could not be considered an integral part of the FIR, which contained first-hand information and any such qualifications attached to the complainant's post or secondary statement. Was not In this case, the source of his knowledge or belief did not explain or disclose the alleged interference of the accused under further investigation of his crime under section 497 (2), on the bail granted to the accused in the circumstances. Submitted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
