Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE KHANEWAL

Article 12 (2) The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Prior to the trial court's failure to have the opportunity to present evidence, the trial court's right to respondents was terminated. The review court allowed the respondents an opportunity not to take advantage of the opportunity again The respondents' request for review was also dismissed; it was necessary for the respondents to present evidence but instead their counsel Preferred to participate in elections where he was not a candidate for any seat A. Closer right of respondents' evidence as neither their lawyer nor their witnesses were present High Court refuses to interfere with constitutional jurisdiction Constitutional High Court dismisses

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• GHULAM NABI v. State 2010 YLR 1445
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA v. State 2010 MLD 1446
• TAYYAB AHMAD alias Makki v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1450
• MUHAMMAD FAISAL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1455
• NAJAM-UD-DIN DAR v. State 2010 MLD 1458
• MUHAMMAD ISMAIL v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1460
• NUSRAT BIBI v. ALLAH BAKHSH 2010 CLC 1465
• AZHAR IQBAL v. State 2010 YLR 1466

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

best law firms from Mardan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes