NIDA-E-MILLAT, CITIZEN COMMUNITY BOARD, MULTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, MULTAN REGION,MULTAN
Article 199 The Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409, and the constitutional petition for termination of trust by public servants, petitioner's counsel to quash the FIR Claimed that the Community Board was created. Under Section 98 of the Punjab Local Government Ordinance 2001, there was a fiduciary and members of the board and workers did not fall in the appreciation of `` public servant '', the petitioner's opinion being that the inquiry was launched under the counter. had gone. The laws of corruption were without jurisdiction by the department, the law petitioner prayed for the enforcement of the anti-corruption establishment to terminate the FIR filed against him. The intention of the Legislature was as if funds were provided by the public treasury for public consumption. The goals, which enable people to perform their duties using public funds, were considered to be `public servants', though they could not be civil servants or receive their salaries / compensation from the government that board officials. `` There were no civil servants and their affairs could not be investigated by the Director Anti-Corruption Department. This was of no use because the money spent by the board officials was out of public funds and was to be used for public purposes only if it was said that the money was misused, then it could not be said. That can't be processed under the board. The constitutional application for anti-corruption laws was not filed by the board officials, but was filed by the board.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
