Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR ALI versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOT ADU

Article 5 and Schedule of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The effect of granting the concluding results of the constitutional restitution allowance The plaintiff sued for recovery of Dover and restitution allowance for himself and the minors; The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff on the date of the dowry and rehabilitation until the marriage of the minor daughter and the minor son of 18 years, the minor denied the allowance and rehabilitation allowance related to the minor at Rs 1200 per month. That the appeal filed by the respondent was dismissed, the rate of Rs. 1200 was not excessive or strict.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• QUTUB-UD-DIN KHAN v. KHUDA BAKHSH 2010 YLR 634
• Sufi MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. State 2010 MLD 638
• MAHMOOD AKHTAR KHAN v. State 2010 CLD 639
• NIDA-E-MILLAT, CITIZEN COMMUNITY BOARD, MULTAN through Chairman v. DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, MULTAN REGION,MULTAN 2010 YLR 643
• IRSHAD BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2010 PLD 649
• BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LIMITED through Chief Executive 2010 CLD 651
• QAISAR ALI SHEIKH v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2010 PLC(CS) 652
• HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary v. Mian IRSHAD HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 654

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

how to become a advocate from Karak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes