Find a Lawyer

QAISAR ALI SHEIKH versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Article 199 Constitution Petition was appealed by the applicants for the return of the special allowance given to the civil service employees that the Punjab Police should withdraw one month's salary given to them by the authorities in view of the applicant's risk allowance pay package. Lee was. All police prosecutors working as DSP Legal and Inspector Legal were allowed a special allowance for their salary plus a month's base salary. The increase in the salaries of police officers was paid by the special duty to increase the salaries of police officers and to increase the salaries of Islamabad and motorways by paying special salaries to the police officers. ? The order from which the police withdrew the benefits made it clear that the special incentive allowance offered to applicants on an extra monthly basic pay scale was not withdrawn and the applicants could not be excluded from the aforementioned special allowance petitioners. In the circumstances, they were entitled. These authorities were directed by the High Court to allow the applicants to pay special allowance. They should also be paid arrears. And if any was recovered, it should be paid

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• NIDA-E-MILLAT, CITIZEN COMMUNITY BOARD, MULTAN through Chairman v. DIRECTOR, ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, MULTAN REGION,MULTAN 2010 YLR 643
• ZAFAR ALI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KOT ADU 2010 MLD 648
• IRSHAD BEGUM v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE 2010 PLD 649
• BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LIMITED through Chief Executive 2010 CLD 651
• HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary v. Mian IRSHAD HUSSAIN 2010 PLD 654
• ZULFIQAR ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 655
• GHAZANFAR ALI v. State 2010 YLR 657
• IMRAN YASIN v. State 2010 MLD 657

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes