Sections 497, 155 (2), 156 and 157 of the Conduct Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 295A & 295C, using derogatory remarks in connection with inciting religious sentiments and guaranteeing attendance, on denial of bail. The Supreme Court also denied the allegations but the senior superintendent of police requested the accused's lawyer to allow him to withdraw the bail plea. The High Court observed that the senior superintendent of police had already passed the power of the criminal court. Was terminated and the guilty verdict was passed. Recorded eight paragraphs and expressed their views on the inability of the accused to prosecute, the evidence submitted by the prosecution was discussed, which is exclusively in the court of law and the police It may not be allowed to be used by the officer's request. The order was not allowed by the Senior Superintendent of Police to withdraw the bail application and the pleas made by him in this case were rejected and the matter was decided by the police officer's court, how much Can only be advanced, cannot be allowed to exercise powers, and has been entrusted to the court of law to order and display the statute under the rule of law, exceeding the limits set by law An intimidating police officer cannot be disappointed or allowed to deviate. The Syed police officer assumed the powers of the court to record the verdict which led to the acquittal of the accused. The court upheld the conduct of section CCP
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
