BANKERS EQUITY LIMITED versus BENTONITE PAKISTAN LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Section 9 and 10 of the Bankers' Aviation Act (XVIII of 1891), Section 2 (8) of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.VII, of R 11, denied the plaintiff's statement, denied after filing denied leave. However, the banking court dismissed the plaintiff for not submitting the statement of account in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 (2) of the Financial Institutions (Restoration) Ordinance; The plaintiffs' argument was that the submission by the banking court was For the leave application to be dismissed, the plaintiffs should have automatically ruled that it was not lawful to contest the plaintiffs and the courts had to make up their mind and right. Applying Anon was under legal obligation, despite the fact that the defendant appeared before the court or not, the statement of facts presented before the court was reflected in the accounts and documents associated with the account. The statement was not supported by the statement of the account as per the provisions of Section 9 (2) of the Financial Affairs (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance, 2001, as contemplated by the provisions of the Bankers' Box Student Act 1891. , The plaintiff was rightly rejected by the banking court, the High Court in the order passed by a single judge appeal Intervention was denied. Dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
