PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT DEPUTY COLLECTOR, TOBA TEK SINGH versus ABDUL HANIF
On the basis of the jurisdiction of the Civil Court Scope Plaintiff for the allotment of land under Section 36 Specific Relief Act (1 of 1877), Section 42 Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), Section 52 Gray Moor Food Scheme suit. Claimed that the land was allotted by the Punjab government under the Guru Murad Food Scheme and that the plaintiffs were the clear purchaser of the disputed land from these vendors due to lack of jurisdiction of the trial court. And before that allotment had taken place. After the fraudulent purchase was made and after submitting the petition, the trial court dismissed the case of the plaintiff appellate court, on appeal, it was granted and the findings of the trial court's defendants were reversed. The first land that was allotted was minor. Five years in 1958 and he was not eligible for land allotment because he was not cultivating or in possession of the same defenses. The NTS further claimed that the fingerprints on applications for land allotment were also forged. Granted, the deadline for filing an application for alternative land under the Guru Muir Food Scheme was 31 7 1983, while the applicant was allotted the disputed land on 22 7 1973, in the year 1990, the trial court was allowed to intervene. Where the order passed under the Colonization of Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 was void or without jurisdiction Was either illegal or not in excess of the jurisdiction or otherwise in accordance with the law or on the basis. Under section 36 of the Government Land Colonial Law (Punjab) Act, 1912, the fraudulent bars will be available only there.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
