Find a Lawyer

INTIZAR HUSSAIN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 382/411 Receiving stolen and fraudulently stolen property, along with its two original brothers and three others, was included in the FIR Which was recorded after a delay of three months. Complainant discharged three co-accused: Real brother of the accused was also guaranteed. The accused was behind bars for the last three months. The accused recovered Rs. There was a bounce in the accused's case. Section 497, fully covered by sub-section (2) of the CCP and requiring further investigation of his crime, the accused was released on bail.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• Mst. NASIM BIBI v. State 2010 YLR 2695
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Deputy Collector, Toba Tek Singh v. ABDUL HANIF 2010 YLR 2699
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2010 YLR 2707
• AMANAT MASIH v. Mst. NAJMA BIBI 2010 YLR 2711
• Mst. FARZANA alias SABA v. State 2010 YLR 2717
• Mst. KHURSHID BIBI v. LIAQAT ALI 2010 YLR 2729
• TAHIR v. State 2010 YLR 2732
• SULTAN AHMAD v. ALLAH DITTA 2010 YLR 2743

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

registration advocate from Goular Khel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes