Article 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Rehabilitation, the suit was filed by the Family Court for the restoration by the Family Court on the basis of which the Family Court ruled. Rs 2000 was fixed monthly for maintenance. The issue of restoration of the past and future care at the same rate was dismissed by the defendant's appeal against the Family Court decision. Counsel for the plaintiff was of the opinion that since the defendant was a Christian according to religion, the Family Court had no jurisdiction to pass any order against the defendant so there was never any question of jurisdiction by the plaintiff. Was raised. The plaintiff had not raised any such ground before the appellate court at the time of filing the appeal and even the defendant had failed to include that basis in the constitutional petition. Do not go ahead with its requests All matters will be decided in all four corners The question of jurisdiction could be raised as soon as possible, but in the present case it was not done, unless otherwise provided for under the provisions of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964. I would apply, the family court had wide jurisdiction to maintain matters. For maintenance of maintenance
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
