Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (i) (ii) / 337 F (i) (v) / 337 L (ii) / 148/149 Various types of damages Guaranteed, Pressure on bail wounds In the clearance FIR, the complainant had made his inquiry case by the complainant. None of the offenses were within the scope of the prohibition contained in section 9999 contained (1), the CCP challan was presented to the trial court, the accused did not need further investigation and was jailed indefinitely. Could not be held back because the bail was allowed in those circumstances before the trial.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. State 2010 YLR 2685
• MUHAMMAD MUNIR v. KANEEZ FATIMA 2010 YLR 2691
• Mst. NASIM BIBI v. State 2010 YLR 2695
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Deputy Collector, Toba Tek Singh v. ABDUL HANIF 2010 YLR 2699
• AMANAT MASIH v. Mst. NAJMA BIBI 2010 YLR 2711
• INTIZAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2716
• Mst. FARZANA alias SABA v. State 2010 YLR 2717
• Mst. KHURSHID BIBI v. LIAQAT ALI 2010 YLR 2729

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

list of supreme court advocates from Chaghi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes