Find a Lawyer

SULTAN AHMAD versus ALLAH DITTA

R19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The appointment of Lambert Petitioner, who was the son of the deceased Lambert, challenged the appointment of the respondent as Lambert, claiming that he was the son of the deceased Lambert. Should have been determined under the terms of. The applicant had no power because the rule of the preliminary law was un-Islamic and any finding of coordination of the four courts below against the petitioner's lawyer and lawyer against the integration of Islam was unlawful in any order. The legal scope failed to identify the error. Failure to file any genuine complaint to sue the High Court for interference in its constitutional jurisdiction

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• INTIZAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 2716
• Mst. FARZANA alias SABA v. State 2010 YLR 2717
• Mst. KHURSHID BIBI v. LIAQAT ALI 2010 YLR 2729
• TAHIR v. State 2010 YLR 2732
• ABDUL LATIF v. State 2010 YLR 2747
• PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL 2010 YLR 2759
• MUHAMMAD MANSHA KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 2764
• MEHMOOD ALI v. KHADIM HUSSAIN alias BAGH ALI 2010 YLR 2772

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

top advocates from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes