Section 403 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 25 (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 13 Constitutional Appeal Inquiry Law Decree of Autofire Breath, Auto Refuse Offender or Double Risk Scope and Request Against National Accountability Bureau The inquiry was initiated by the applicant on the last occasion for the corruption and corruption practices under the provisions of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, on the last occasion, the applicant should adopt voluntary returns and plea deals under section 25 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999. The contract between which the contract was signed and the finalization. Applicant and Chairman National Accountability Bureau Applicant claimed that they were being re-investigated on the issues which were settled in previous inquiry and violated Article 13 of the Constitution and Section 403, CR PC. Was retried which protected one of the accused. The person against double jeopardy, therefore, the second inquiry was not valid under the law against him. The applicant further claimed that the expulsion of an accused under section 25 (a) of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999 had the same effect. From which the court was dismissed by the National Accountability Bureau that a previous inquiry against the stand was initiated. The misappropriation of funds through fake vouchers and fake vouchers resulted in a loss of Rs 70,00,000 to the state exchequer while the accumulation of assets beyond the legitimate sources by the applicant under current inquiry section 25 (a). is about. ) The Chairman of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, after being strictly out of the court between the National Accountability Bureau and the accused, dismissed or acquitted the accused by voluntary return.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
