Find a Lawyer

LIAQUAT IQBAL versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Qatil Ahmed appreciated the evidence, considering the distance of 30 km between the police station and immediately blamed the accused for the firing of the firearm on the head of the accused, On the occasion, the accused accused of absconding with the three offenses found in his instant death rifle absconded with the law for 35 days, medical evidence was available in the light of day and the report of the forensic science lab was fully supported. The regular statement of the incident was that the accused party had already killed one of the complainant's sons and the present victim was his second son, who was killed by the accused and the death sentence of the accused was confirmed.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• MUHAMMAD AMBER v. JAN MUHAMMAD 2010 YLR 2812
• Haji IMAM DIN v. Mst. SIFTAN BIBI 2010 YLR 2825
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. CHAIRMAN, NAB 2010 YLR 2829
• MEHBOOB ALI QURESHI v. SHAFIQUL HAQ SHIRAZI 2010 YLR 2836
• RIAZ HUSSAIN v. Mst. WASO 2010 YLR 2846
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2010 YLR 2852
• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. AMEER ALTAF 2010 YLR 2862
• NOORANI STEEL MILLS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 YLR 2872

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gaggo Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes