Failure to obtain a controversial title for section 8 occupation The construction plan was approved in 1975, and construction was completed and the plaintiff filed a lawsuit to recover possession. Was not raised because the plaintiff had refrained from his conduct to file the case but the property in question was allotted to the parties from the 1950s to the 1960s but the plaintiff never cared about the possession They claimed in 1987, in the form of a suit after the construction was completed by the other party, therefore, the proprietor found The dispute arose in the affidavit, therefore, the trial of the occupier without seeking relief was unable to be retained and at the same time the findings were found to be in addition to the facts against the plaintiff's High Court in exercising the amended jurisdiction. Was refused to intervene in the ruling and the orders passed below the review by the two courts were dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
