Section 230) (b) and Q 324 Qatil Amad, attempts to value the evidence and the collar account were not in accordance with the medical evidence and the complainant had modified his statement in the Complaint Court to resolve the difference. Another statement was recorded after the victim's post-mortem examination and denied his own injuries, which have been charged to three of the accused. The other eyewitness testified that the accused had reached the scene after the shootings. The eight accused were acquitted. The trial court and the appeals against his acquittal were dismissed by the High Court's strong affirmation of the ocular testimony, therefore, it was necessary to maintain the conviction of the accused in the capital charge, especially when the complainant's statement Changed version causes inherent errors. Fragment of evidence presenting an autonomous enclosure by an unidentified source T o an account of the suspect was available on record. In such cases the defendant's release could not confirm the complainant's statement.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
