Find a Lawyer

FAZAL ABBAS ALIAS FOJU versus STATE

Section 2 302 (b) appreciating the evidence, said that the bullet recovered from the victim's body was not fired from a gun that was recovered, which was reported by the police before his death. Was recorded. And the thumb marked it, cannot be regarded as an important piece of evidence, nor can its dying declaration be accepted only if there is weak evidence that the person making it immediately But there was a risk of death and it would not be possible to lie, while the deceased was not in such a situation that a motivational ocular account was not established and did not lead to credibility and credibility. There was no reason to deny the statements, the cause of death of the doctor was not disclosed. Ydykl evidence of co-determination co-accused did not testify akulr support has caused serious damage to the prosecution story the accused was acquitted in the UAE

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• RIAZ HUSSAIN v. Mst. WASO 2010 YLR 2846
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. State 2010 YLR 2852
• ABDUL GHAFFAR v. AMEER ALTAF 2010 YLR 2862
• NOORANI STEEL MILLS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 YLR 2872
• IRAM JAVAID v. BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN 2010 YLR 2886
• ZUMMRUD KHAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, PAKISTAN BAIT-UL-MAL v. GHULAM SYEDAIN RIZVI 2010 YLR 2892
• MUHAMMAD IDREES v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Defence, Government of Pakistan 2010 YLR 2895
• MUHAMMAD SHEHZAD alias BHUTTO v. State 2010 YLR 2902

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

advocates from Patika lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes