Court under the revocation of section 497 (5) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 31919 and 316 of the Gilgit-Baltistan (Authorization and Sovereignty) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Qatl e Khata, Qutb eem Bell, Challan. Submitted in section 191919, PPC bail was granted to the accused on the basis that the offense under section 191919, PPC is a guaranteed trial court, however, against the accused under section 161616, PPC. He was charged with capital punishment for fourteen years and sentenced to fourteen years in prison. On this basis it was sought to cancel that the offense under 566, PPC section 497 (1), had come under the prohibited clause of the CRPC and such accused was not eligible for bail. The hearing has not yet determined whether or not he is guilty of the crime. The accused will be prosecuted under Section 191919, PPC or Section 6 316, PPC, and it was not appropriate for the Supreme Appeal Court to comment on the nature of the crime in the present appellate court, which led to the trial. I may be biased by both sides. For the complainant who knew such a situation, the present Russell was not pressurized and in this case after the recording of material evidence a request for permission was filed before the trial court, whose request was appropriate.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
