THE STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL versus ASIF AHMED
Attempts to commit Section 497 (5) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6/7 Conviction AMD, Terrorist Qatl e amd Baltistan (Sovereignty and Self-Government) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) bail, the parties' cancellation had agreed not to discuss the application on merit, if the trial court directed the trial within two months. The charge in the case was fixed without delay, but the trial cannot be held. Due to some unforeseen circumstances, the accused was eventually granted bail, the delay in the trial was a misuse of law and court proceedings and injustice to the parties, the trial court was directed that day. On the day of the trial, refusing to postpone it for any reason. , Take stringent measures to attend witnesses and terminate the trial within two months. In the default case, the complainant or the state may file an earlier application for bail cancellation against the accused. The trial court adjudicated accordingly for the merit petition
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
