AIX, R 13 Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) Under the preceding injunction, the previous order of administration approved against the defendant was appointed by the trial court but its use I upheld the Lower Appellate Court amending jurisdiction that the Chief Justice restored the order passed by the trial court on the basis of the technical merits of the law, which could not be personally appropriate, but an attempt to decide the merits of the matter in the interest of justice. Should be done. The date of the passing of the previous party order was not considered an appropriate place to pass the previous party order and as a result the Chief Justice rightly rejected the order. The Chief Justice discussed all aspects of the case in detail. The case was remanded to the trial court for judgment on merit. The Chief Appellate Court could not find any reasonable basis for intervention in which the appeal of the Chief Court's leave was denied.
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
