Section 42 and 8 of the Gilgit-Baltistan (Sovereign and Self-Government) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) dismissed the agreement to revoke the contract, disobeying the order passed by the plaintiff of the Chief Court Paid and took possession of it. The plaintiff's estate and thereafter he was delaying payment of the remaining amount The plaintiff filed a lawsuit to revoke the contract and the trial court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of his property. But the lower appellate court set aside this decision and the decree passed by the trial court was, in the exercise of the second appeal, set aside the judgment and order passed by the lower appellate court and the trial court Restored the judgment rendered by the plaintiff that the plaintiff failed to grant him the land unanimously Yes, it was. The patch of land in his possession, the plaintiff had no other land nearby, the plaintiff was in possession of the lane, the house was enjoying the benefits of the land with the shed and livestock of the defendant. He also failed to comply with the order of the Chief Court, in which he was directed to deposit some money till a certain date but failed to comply with that order. Instead of the court, he tried to present the case in a wrong way, but the Supreme Appeal Court agreed with the decision and order of the Chief Court and it was retained and the appeal was denied. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
