Find a Lawyer

versus

Article 61 The scarcity of power application against the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Appellate Court scope chief engineer (water and power) stated that six new hydropower projects are under construction and the problem of power shortage will be resolved upon completion. Will The report further revealed that loadshedding was encountered. Since there was uninterrupted power supply in Gilgit city and the surrounding area, there is no need to operate diesel generators at this time and the amount collected for generator fuel purpose will be used sparingly in the next water season. ? Load shedding in Gilgit and adjoining areas as described in the report has been personally confirmed by the Chief Engineer in the court, no further action was required in the case.

Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010

• State v. KALAB ALI 2010 GBLR 256
• KHALID ALI v. State 2010 GBLR 263
• FAQIR MUHAMMAD, SUB-INSPECTOR POLICE v. THE STATE through Police Station Astore 2010 GBLR 266
• MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE 2010 GBLR 266
• MEHARBAN ALI v. SHAKOOR KHAN 2010 GBLR 271
• State v. MASHROOF 2010 GBLR 276
• HAFIZ-UR-RAHMAN v. State 2010 GBLR 277
• SHAKIRULLAH alias DOCTOR v. State 2010 GBLR 280

All Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes