NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH COORDINATOR SUB-REGION OFFICE, GILGIT versus KARIM AHMED SHAH
Arts 37 (2) (G) and 60 (13) Election Disqualifying Candidate Defaults On the basis of record provided by the scoop financial institution, financial institution, the Respondent's papers were rejected. ? Defending defendants were declared eligible to contest the election, setting aside the order passed by the Returning Officer. Financial institution suspends order on Chief Justice's request to be bank defaulter, objecting to their endorsement of candidates' disqualification as respondents, either from their opposing candidate or their own constituency. No other person was raised, therefore, the financial institution had no right to challenge his nomination under electoral rules, whichever individual was directly or indirectly affected by any order passed by an authority. There was no right or no grieving person to challenge such an order. The financial responsibility of a person in a public organization may provide a ground for holding such a person in public office if the person is declared a defaulter under the law and the evidence of default on the person's eligibility In the presence of a court, contesting an election does not violate the rights of the financial institutions / organization that they can use the creditors to recover the debt from the creditors. There can be no personal right to raise an objection to eligibility. Become a candidate in the election and the defendant's papers do not grieve against the nomination approval
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
