FAHIM HAIDER versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY KA&GB AFFAIRS
Primable Public Procurement Rules, 2004 Impact Infringement of Contract Effect Rights and Duties Contractor's Contracting Public Acquisition Agreements are governed by the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Ordinance, 2002 and the rules made thereunder. There is a special law on which the contractor fails to provide. Supply schedules may result in a breach of the Goods Agreement at unanimous pricing, which may delay the main project, therefore, the Purchasing Agency may, under this law, terminate the Contractor's contract, including cancellation of its cost and risk contract. The process is bound to take action. By law, contractors are not entitled to any claim outside the scope of the contract and the law, unless the contract is to be paid for additional costs based on the price increase if such contract is not completed within the term of the contract and such No claim is made. Without a commitment to delay the project or delay the completion of the project, it is unfair for contractors to pay based on the price increase in normal circumstances, which is the amount of government funding from the relevant authorities. Therefore, the officials involved in such cases have to face criminal charges as well as the department. The Supreme Court of Appeals for Corruption has observed that the Chief Secretary can investigate the reason for the delay or justification for additional payment to a contractor in the case of surplus payments to the Government of Gilgit-Baltistan. Action in accordance with law
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
