Arts 133 and 151 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), section 5540, at any stage, declares the witness to be a respected court so that a particular fact can be explained or disputed doubt, if there is anything in relation to that fact. On your own or upon request. You may call a witness for re-examination if necessary, if justice and equality is ordered, but neither party may be allowed to fill in the lacuna or fill in any gaps in the evidence. The other party is against the interest of the court. Use the power to call a witness back for a re-examination; in the light of this doctrine, if a witness is required to retrieve and re-examine, it was necessary for that decision to meet the conclusion of the law of justice which I faced a confusing situation. The statement of a material witness was drafted which, under section 404040, CRPC, empowered the court to call the witness again for an examination and the opposing party to re-examine the witness after re-examination. Allow In the interests of the prosecution, the court may dismiss the witness at the request of the prosecutor. And allow him to exercise his right to cross-examine a witness, but there was no concept of defending a witness during cross-examination by defense. And if the witness made a statement intentionally or in any other way, causing suspicion in the investigation, the benefit of the doubt was always given to the accused and could not be withheld for the prosecution. The Chief of Examination was related to the statement. And if a witness is present after cross-examination by defense
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
