Section 302 (b) Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6/7 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Gilgit-Baltistan (Authorization and Self-Administration) Order, 2009, Article 60 (13) ) The trial court convicted and sentenced the accused, with possession of torture, terrorism and weapons, but the chief court dismissed the trial court's decision, giving the accused the benefit of the doubt. The appeal against the prosecution proved the accused's allegation beyond doubt. , Which the trial court's defense counsel rightly considered, could not break the facts of the 30-bore pistol, which described the facts of the prosecution's testimony and directly linked the accused to the crime weapon. In the presence of the restoration memo of the arrest of the accused by his personal possession, the delay in filing an FIR under section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Order had no effect on the merits of the original case, crime vacant and live cartridge ballistic expert. After being examined, it was discovered that the recovered pistol had been fired on the accused number and its nature. The weapon was the one shown in the recovery memo, the prosecution's version of the prosecution's prosecution of any fraud or recovery memo changes was not permanent, reliable and credible and was considered right. Had no imagination, could not be labeled. As the interested witnesses, the prosecution proved the allegations against the accused beyond the shadow of any doubt; the trial against the accused was, in the circumstances, suitable for life imprisonment, the main court's controversial decision was set aside and the trial. Hearing
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
