PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF GILGIT-BALTISTAN versus TAHIRA BEGUM
Article 60 (13) The Right Petition Civil Service was transferred from one place to another for respondents (school teachers), who were transferred from one city to another at a different location, calling for the impression that the respondents' exchange The order is illegal chief The court's administrative job was to post and exchange the legal transfer order and the public servant could not claim posting at any particular place or post, unless he had such position or Don't have a posting claim against a particular post. Under the terms and conditions of his service, instead of making new appointments against vacant posts, authorities moved respondents, who were largely satisfactory, to work at their place of work based on this order. Because there was no nexus. Without a valid reason for transferring respondents, the transfer of low-paid teachers from one place to another should be in the proper use of power, which not only contradicts education policy and the public interest, but can also suffer. In the light of Education Education Department, the competent authority in the Department of Education may make general or individual transfers of teachers. In the present case as per the requirement of their services in the public interest, the Chief Court considered the order of exchange of respondents, not in accordance with the policy of good faith education, arbitrarily approved the same illegal order of the Chief Justice. The jurisdiction was not interfered with by the Supreme Appellate Court
Related judgments — Supreme Appelate Court Gilgit, 2010
