Sections 13, 14, 20 and 21 were filed by the trial court at the same time as the court's application for making the award as a rule of law, and the appellate court award under question was given by the arbitrators without the intervention of the court. Was based on the consent of the parties and under the agreement and action under section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, after the declaration of the award, it was the arbitrator who had to submit the award to the court at the request of a party. Or the court's direction, for the purpose of ruling the court's award, did not have to be mechanically acted as if it were its law The status, retention, and governance of the party is required to seal its approval without determining the party's question. Due to the special rule of the court, Make could not enter the award, especially when the award was processed between the parties before obtaining the court's approval and approval. In such a case, after proper appreciation of the evidence on record, it would be useless to ask about the rule of the two courts below. The lawyer for the applicant was unable to identify the lawyer illegally. Or the irregularity in the jurisdiction was rejected by the two courts below the request
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
