O VII, R 2, OV & O IX, R 13 Trial of the trial for recovery of suit The court granted the ex parte decree against the defendant and dismissed the request for the ex parte decree to be set aside. The plaintiff claimed that notices were not given on the basis of the provisions of the OV, the delivery of the terms of the OV by the CPC was not complied with by the CPC for the service of the defendants, And prefer the goals of technicians who needed to discourage the promotion of natural justice to prevent the delivery of justice so that no one would condemn any serious prior decisions and injunctions. His request for a separation of the previous order was not in accordance with the defendant's and dismissal law. The case should have been decided on merit. The former party's dormitory was set aside and with the direction to hold the trial within four months. Was sent to the trial court. The presence of the defendants as a party, in whose absence the court cannot pass a valid order
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
