The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application, to maintain illegal dispossession, passed the order of the trial court on the trial made under section 3 of the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005. Which was, under which the trial court, for the first time, rendered the complaint competent. And the impugned order directing the applicants to submit their bail bonds to the applicant was not a final order which could be challenged in the constitutional petition, and in this regard, the petitioner had already considered the matter. And after recording supportive and contradictory evidence, the complaint had to be adjudicated on its merits and strictly in accordance with the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005, which discouraged the occupants of the land and the rights of the landlord and property owner. Was asked to protect the planet. There was not a lawyer for the applicants for the illegal and illegal occupants to identify the error of any jurisdiction which has been made under the court in an unenforceable order, with the constitutional application being premature. Also excluded because of his ability to qualify.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
