On the basis of Section 122 and 123 gifts, the legitimate respondent who owned the legacy of his late father as well as his brother in law's late inheritance, alleged that the applicant (s) had The disputed land property was transferred to him by the name of the gifting variable and that when the gifted variants of the gift were challenged in civil court, to prove its authenticity as well as the three leading components of the gift. The beneficiary of the certificate / process will be banned. That is, the declaration of the gift, the acceptance of the aforesaid gift offer, and the delivery of the possession according to the law, there was no evidence in the record to indicate the completion of the three essential components in the present case. Used to The defendant, who was an expatriate woman, nor did the journal mention mentioning possession of the suit land in favor of the applicant, neither was it confirmed by Tamil, nor did the woman affect the document with the thumb. He is personally facing fraud in the presence of a certifying officer. In the circumstances, it was consequently complied with which the alleged alterations in the gifts were confirmed on the basis of the applicant's association with the Revenue Officers and, in addition to the decision and decision of the Appellate Court. Yes, I was not subjected to any irregularities or instability or chronic error; for reasons that I did not ask for any reason, I did not ask for any amendment by the High Court. Contradiction in authority
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
