Under Article 6, 13, 24 and 32 of the Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OII, R11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, a written statement was filed for refusal to dismiss the plaintiff / seller under the constitutional petition. The charges were dismissed by the trial court on two grounds for changing and not submitting 1 / 3rd of the entry price, but the appellate court requested review of the petition filed by the plaintiff on both grounds. Excluded In respondent's request for the dismissal of Section 24 of the plaintiff's review of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act 1987, it was mandated by the court to submit the 1st / 3rd plaintiff to the court on the issue of sale. To do And if no sale price is mentioned in the sale, then order the collection of 1/3 of the probable value of the property when the defendant has taken into account the sale proceedings in view of the proceedings in the present case. Considering that the plaintiff was charged, the trial court had to instruct the plaintiff / pre-emptor to meet the reduction in the amount stated by a certain date, combining the law and the facts. On the question of the extent of the question, the appellate court declared the victim of legal weakness in reviewing the judgment / order passed, which Streets and it could not be sent in an aside, after the decision of the trial court and law suits were restored.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2010
